Skeletal Sexing Stadards Of Human Remains in Turkey
Skeletal Sexing Stadards Of Human Remains in Turkey - Öznur Gülhan
1. Introductıon
1.1. General Overview
1.2. Research Aims and Objectives
2. Forensıc Anthropology
2.1. The Discipline of Forensic Anthropology
2.2. The Role of Forensic Anthropology
2.3. History and Development0
2.4. Forensic Anthropology in Turkey
3. Theory Of Skeletal Sex In Forensıc Anthropology
3.1. Personal Identification
3.2. Sexual Dimorphism
3.3. Sex Assessment
4. Femur
4.1. Anatomy of the Femur
4.2. Sexual Dimorphism in the Femur
4.3. Sex assessment Methods on the Femur
4.4. Early Descriptive Research on the Femur
5. Computed Tomography (Ct)
5.1. Background of Computed Tomography (CT)
5.2. History and Role of CT Imaging in Biological Profiling
5.3. Validation Study
6. Materıals And Methods
6.1. Validation Study
6.2. Comparison of three image processing techniques
6.3. Main Study
7. Results
7.1. Validation study Results
7.2. Comparison of three imaging techniques
7.3. Left and Right Side Differences
7.4. Intra-Observer Error
7.5. Main Study
8. Dıscussıon And Conclusıon
8.1. Discussion
8.2. Limitations
8.3. Conclusion
(Tanıtım Bülteninden)
Skeletal Sexing Stadards Of Human Remains in Turkey - Öznur Gülhan
1. Introductıon
1.1. General Overview
1.2. Research Aims and Objectives
2. Forensıc Anthropology
2.1. The Discipline of Forensic Anthropology
2.2. The Role of Forensic Anthropology
2.3. History and Development0
2.4. Forensic Anthropology in Turkey
3. Theory Of Skeletal Sex In Forensıc Anthropology
3.1. Personal Identification
3.2. Sexual Dimorphism
3.3. Sex Assessment
4. Femur
4.1. Anatomy of the Femur
4.2. Sexual Dimorphism in the Femur
4.3. Sex assessment Methods on the Femur
4.4. Early Descriptive Research on the Femur
5. Computed Tomography (Ct)
5.1. Background of Computed Tomography (CT)
5.2. History and Role of CT Imaging in Biological Profiling
5.3. Validation Study
6. Materıals And Methods
6.1. Validation Study
6.2. Comparison of three image processing techniques
6.3. Main Study
7. Results
7.1. Validation study Results
7.2. Comparison of three imaging techniques
7.3. Left and Right Side Differences
7.4. Intra-Observer Error
7.5. Main Study
8. Dıscussıon And Conclusıon
8.1. Discussion
8.2. Limitations
8.3. Conclusion
(Tanıtım Bülteninden)
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
1 | - | - |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 74,90 | 224,70 |
4 | - | - |
6 | 38,85 | 233,10 |
9 | 26,72 | 240,45 |
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
1 | - | - |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 77,49 | 232,47 |
4 | - | - |
6 | 38,50 | 231,00 |
9 | 26,72 | 240,45 |
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
1 | - | - |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 74,90 | 224,70 |
4 | - | - |
6 | 38,50 | 231,00 |
9 | 26,72 | 240,45 |
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
1 | - | - |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 74,90 | 224,70 |
4 | - | - |
6 | 38,68 | 232,05 |
9 | 26,72 | 240,45 |
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
1 | - | - |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 74,90 | 224,70 |
4 | 57,23 | 228,90 |
6 | 38,50 | 231,00 |
9 | 26,72 | 240,45 |
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
1 | - | - |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 74,90 | 224,70 |
4 | - | - |
6 | 38,50 | 231,00 |
9 | 26,72 | 240,45 |
Taksit Sayısı | Taksit tutarı | Genel Toplam |
---|---|---|
Tek Çekim | 210,00 | 210,00 |
2 | 105,00 | 210,00 |
3 | 74,90 | 224,70 |
4 | - | - |
6 | 38,50 | 231,00 |
9 | 26,83 | 241,50 |